Team Global Logistics Company Limited

Team Global Logistics Company Limited 亨達國際運通股份有限公司 Our customers run businesses in Asia, Europe, North/ South America, Australia, South Africa and more.

Founded in 1998, TGL is an experienced freight forwarder, logistics & supply chain management company for Asia with American, EU trade, under the licenses of NVOCC, IATA & FIATA. Headquartered in Hong Kong, TGL provides all-encompassing logistics & supply chain management services with 20 branches in China, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. We customize logistics total

solutions from ocean/ air/ road transportation to customs clearance, warehousing, distribution centers for B2B, B2C, e-commerce, FBA and project movement. Stay updated on TGL Blog articles at https://www.tgl-group.net/en/

Subscribe our Blog: https://successful-author-5443.ck.page/8db681257b

【時事分享】 微軟七款自研AI模型背後,一個很直白的目標:不再付費給Anthropic企業導入AI工具的速度,遠超過預算規劃的速度。很多公司在嘗到AI工具的效益之後,才發現帳單長得比預期快太多,開始在內部限制使用額度或重新評估哪些工具值得繼...
11/06/2026

【時事分享】 微軟七款自研AI模型背後,一個很直白的目標:不再付費給Anthropic

企業導入AI工具的速度,遠超過預算規劃的速度。很多公司在嘗到AI工具的效益之後,才發現帳單長得比預期快太多,開始在內部限制使用額度或重新評估哪些工具值得繼續付費。這個成本問題,不只發生在科技公司。

微軟AI事業負責人蘇萊曼(Mustafa Suleyman)上週在Build開發者大會發布七款自研模型,說的也是同一件事:「Anthropic非常貴,我認為很多人都在急著找替代方案。我們付了很多錢給Anthropic,所以我們的目標是降低、並且最終消除這筆支出。」

旗艦模型MAI-Thinking-1在人類偏好評估上比肩Claude Sonnet 4.6,在SWE-bench Pro程式編寫基準上與Claude Opus 4.6相當,整套訓練過程不採用任何第三方模型的知識蒸餾。另一款MAI-Code-1-Flash則已開始在GitHub Copilot與Visual Studio Code推出。微軟的邏輯是用自家模型跑在Azure上,省掉目前付給第三方的費用,再把部分節省轉給企業客戶。

這個競爭格局對使用AI工具的企業有直接意義。過去兩年,企業端AI工具市場幾乎被Anthropic與OpenAI主導,使用成本不低,替代選項也不多。微軟這一步,加上它在企業軟體生態的既有布局,可能是這個市場出現真正定價競爭的開始。

蘇萊曼也坦言Anthropic目前仍領先數個月,但「六個月內,我們縮短了巨大的差距」。
Anthropic已秘密向SEC提交IPO申請,潛在估值超過1兆美元,一旦上市,對大客戶的定價只會更硬,不會更軟。微軟選在這個時間點自研替代方案,時機的選擇本身就說明了一切。

AI工具的成本正在從「技術議題」變成「管理議題」。這個市場的競爭格局正在改變,速度比多數人預期的快。

https://s.tgl-group.net/96bfqz

#人工智慧

微軟將推出一系列新AI模型,力圖追上領先的AI新創公司Anthropic。Anthropic 耕耘企業用戶,對微軟的主力軟體產品構成威脅。

【A 30 to 45-day ocean voyage: The ultimate test for Extra Virgin Olive Oil quality】Extra Virgin Olive Oil is commonly pe...
10/06/2026

【A 30 to 45-day ocean voyage: The ultimate test for Extra Virgin Olive Oil quality】

Extra Virgin Olive Oil is commonly perceived as a shelf-stable food product. However, the 30 to 45-day journey from Mediterranean origins like Spain or Italy, crossing the Suez Canal and traversing the Indian Ocean before finally arriving at Taiwan’s Keelung or Kaohsiung ports, is a continuous stress test for product quality.

⚠️ Heat: The silent killer of liquid gold
Standard dry containers can see internal temperatures skyrocket past 50°C when crossing the equator. Once ambient temperatures exceed 25°C, the peroxide value in olive oil accelerates, free acidity increases, and the delicate herbal and fruity aromas quickly deteriorate into a rancid taste. For high-end, premium oils, this is not just a minor quality issue. It represents a substantial loss in commercial value.

Temperature control is not an added bonus, it is the baseline.

🏹Tailored Cold Chain Solutions:
• Re**er Containers: Maintaining a steady 15 to 18°C throughout the voyage, this is the most reliable choice for premium oils.
• Thermal Liners: Formulated to mitigate sudden external temperature spikes, making it a viable option for mid-range products with tight budgets.
• Flexitanks with Re**ers: Maximizing cargo space utilization, this combination serves as the go-to cost-reduction strategy for bulk liquid raw materials.

⚠️ Two Hidden Regulatory Pitfalls at the Border:
Upon arrival in Taiwan, compliance details can make or break the shipment.

• HS Code Classification: Extra Virgin Olive Oil must be classified under 1509.20.00. Any misclassification directly impacts customs duty assessments and clearance speed.
• TFDA Import Inspection: Tests covering free acidity, heavy metals, adulteration, and Chinese labeling compliance each carry real rejection risks. Non-compliant labeling can lead to mandatory destruction or re-export, which is a severe financial and reputational blow.

💡 Advanced Logistics: Utilizing Bonded Warehousing to Optimize Cash Flow
To manage heavy customs duties and inspection risks, mature importers often choose to move cargo into a food-grade, temperature-controlled bonded warehouse within Taiwan’s Free Trade Zone (FTZ).

Operating under a 4PL framework, this approach allows for partial customs clearance and deferred tax payment. Importers can avoid paying full duties and VAT upfront upon arrival, significantly easing cash flow pressure while effectively isolating risks in case a single batch faces inspection challenges.

The full article, featuring detailed cold chain cost-benefit comparisons and regulatory compliance guidelines, is available on our official website for your reference.

https://s.tgl-group.net/96swvm

How 4PL cold chains, FTZ bonded storage, and TFDA compliance secure high-value food routes to Asia

【一趟 30 到 45 天的海運,是特級初榨橄欖油品質的最大考驗】特級初榨橄欖油在很多人的認知裡,屬於常溫保存的食品。但從西班牙或義大利的產區出發,穿越蘇伊士運河、橫越印度洋,抵達台灣基隆或高雄港,這段 30 到 45 天的航程,對油品品質...
10/06/2026

【一趟 30 到 45 天的海運,是特級初榨橄欖油品質的最大考驗】

特級初榨橄欖油在很多人的認知裡,屬於常溫保存的食品。但從西班牙或義大利的產區出發,穿越蘇伊士運河、橫越印度洋,抵達台灣基隆或高雄港,這段 30 到 45 天的航程,對油品品質來說是一場持續的壓力測試。

⚠️ 高溫,是液態黃金的致命傷
普通乾貨櫃在通過赤道時,櫃內溫度可能飆升至 50°C 以上。只要環境溫度超過 25°C,橄欖油的過氧化值就會加速上升、游離脂肪酸增加,原本細緻的草本與果香會瞬間轉化為油耗味。對高單價的頂級油品來說,這不只是品質稍有影響,而是商業價值的實質損失。

所以,溫控不是加分項,而是底線。

🏹因貨制宜的冷鏈三箭:
• 冷藏櫃(Re**er Container): 全程維持 15-18°C,是高端油品最可靠的避風港。
• 保溫襯墊(Thermal Liner): 減緩外部氣溫驟變,適合預算有限的中價位油品。
• 液袋加冷藏(Flexitank): 空間利用率更高,大宗液態原料的降本首選。

⚠️ 進口邊境的兩大隱形地雷:
到了台灣端,法規面的細節同樣決定成敗。

• HS Code 分類: 特級初榨橄欖油必須歸屬 1509.20.00,分類錯誤將直接影響關稅課徵與通關速度。
• TFDA 食品進口查驗: 游離脂肪酸、重金屬、摻偽檢測,以及中文標籤的合規性,每一項都是實際的卡關風險。標示如果不符規定,貨物可能面臨銷毀或退運,後果不堪設想。

💡 進階運籌:善用保溫保稅倉優化現金流
面對龐大的稅金與檢驗風險,成熟的進口商會選擇將貨物先移入「台灣自由貿易港區的食品級溫控保稅倉庫」。

透過 4PL 模式採取「分批報關、分批完稅」,不僅能大幅降低到港時一次性支付關稅與營業稅的現金流壓力,還能有效分散單批查驗不合格時的「全輸風險」。

完整文章在官網,內有詳細的冷鏈方案比較與法規合規說明,提供給有需要的業界朋友參考。

https://s.tgl-group.net/96swnr

#橄欖油進口 #食品進口查驗 #冷鏈物流 #保稅倉庫 #國際貨代

從西班牙與義大利橄欖油進口到台灣市場,解析冷鏈物流、TFDA 食品檢驗、保稅倉儲與 4PL 協同如何成為高價值食品供應鏈的關鍵競爭力

【Current News】 Washington Targeted 60 Countries on Forced Labor Grounds. Almost Everyone Is Pushing Back.Two days after ...
09/06/2026

【Current News】 Washington Targeted 60 Countries on Forced Labor Grounds. Almost Everyone Is Pushing Back.

Two days after the US Trade Representative declared that 60 trading partners had failed to adequately address trade in goods made with forced labor, the collective response from those countries was swift and largely dismissive. The EU called the tariffs unjustified. Canada's prime minister described the move as unsurprising and said it would not affect the vast majority of Canadian exports. China denied that forced labor exists. India's trade analysts urged New Delhi to challenge the legal basis of the tariffs entirely.

The scope of the announcement is what makes it notable. The 60 trading partners named by the USTR account for almost all goods imported into the United States. They include the UK, the EU, Canada, Japan, India, China, Mexico, Malaysia, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, and dozens of others. The proposed structure splits into two tiers: a 10% rate applying to Canada, the EU, UK, Malaysia, Taiwan, and others, while China, India, and 45 additional countries face 12.5% duties.

The investigation, launched in March, concluded that 54 countries had failed to impose a legal prohibition on importing goods made with forced labor. Six others, including Canada and the EU, were found to have failed to effectively enforce an existing prohibition. That distinction in findings did not produce a distinction in rates.

One important qualifier: the tariffs have not yet been enforced. The Trump administration still needs to complete a formal regulatory process before any duties take effect. That process, combined with the volume of countries simultaneously pushing back and negotiating, leaves the eventual shape of these measures genuinely open.

This is also the second time the administration has announced broad import tariffs since the Supreme Court struck down the Liberation Day tariffs in February, ruling they exceeded presidential authority. The administration is now working through Section 301 investigations, which provide a different legal basis. The current 10% temporary global tariff expires in July unless extended by Congress.

For anyone with supply chain exposure in the named countries, the relevant questions are whether these tariffs take effect, at what final rate, and whether existing bilateral trade deals provide a ceiling. On June 4, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed that US-EU and US-Japan agreements capping tariffs at 15% remain in effect, though that assurance came with a conditional: it holds provided both sides continue to honor their existing commitments.

https://s.tgl-group.net/96bngf

It comes after the US Supreme Court struck down many of US President Donald Trump's previous duties in February.

【時事分享】 關稅換了名目又來了,歐日的15%上限還能撐多久6月4日,美國貿易代表葛里爾在巴黎出席OECD部長級會議時對媒體表示:「我們明白,說話要算話。」這句話說出來的背景,是在美國貿易代表署(USTR)宣布對60個國家祭出強迫勞動關稅兩...
09/06/2026

【時事分享】 關稅換了名目又來了,歐日的15%上限還能撐多久

6月4日,美國貿易代表葛里爾在巴黎出席OECD部長級會議時對媒體表示:「我們明白,說話要算話。」這句話說出來的背景,是在美國貿易代表署(USTR)宣布對60個國家祭出強迫勞動關稅兩天後,試圖安撫包括歐盟在內的貿易夥伴。

去年夏天,美國分別與歐盟及日本達成協議,將大多數輸美商品的關稅上限設定為15%。但於6/2,USTR援引1974年貿易法第301條,以60個國家未能有效遏止強迫勞動商品貿易為由,宣布對這些國家加徵新關稅。歐盟按此面臨10%、日本12.5%的強迫勞動關稅。

華府之所以大費周章改用「301調查」的名目,主因是川普先前的全面關稅被美國最高法院裁定違憲。為了重新構築關稅壁壘,改用反傾銷或不公平貿易調查,成了美方最新的「解套方案」。 葛里爾的解釋是,美歐「特恩貝里(Turnberry)貿易協議」已承認美國可在「一定程度內」加徵關稅,301調查結果則賦予了川普採取行動的法律授權。他也補了一句關鍵條件:「前提是歐盟確實履行特恩貝里協議的承諾。」

歐盟貿易執委塞弗科維奇與葛里爾會面後也說「協議就是協議」,但他從歐盟角度的解讀是:特恩貝里協議涵蓋所有商品的15%關稅上限應全面適用。他也坦言,歐盟國家對被列入強迫勞動關稅名單感到意外,因為歐盟一向擁有嚴格的勞工保障標準。

讓局勢更複雜的,是另一波結果尚未出爐的調查。USTR目前正針對「結構性產能過剩」問題展開第二項301調查,涵蓋中國、歐盟、日本、台灣、越南、馬來西亞等16個主要貿易夥伴,預計未來幾週公布結果。 葛里爾甚至坦言,除非既有協議另有規定,否則這項調查可能導致最終徵收的實際稅率「遠超過15%的上限」。

現在的狀況是:15%上限在名義上仍然有效,但同時有兩項301調查正在進行,每一項都是潛在的防線漏洞。 葛里爾那句「說話算話」背後附帶的隱藏條件,比表面上看起來還要多。

https://s.tgl-group.net/96a3cs

#關稅政策 #國際貿易 #貿易協議 #供應鏈風險 #美國關稅

美國貿易代表葛里爾 (Jamieson Greer) 周四 (4 日) 表示,美國將遵守與歐盟、日本及其他國家達成的貿易協議中的關稅上限,而美國計劃針對強迫勞動商品課徵的新關稅,也具備相應法律依據。

【Curremt News】 Carriers Are Asking $6,000 to Europe. The Space Shortage Means They Might Just Get It.Asia-Europe rates a...
08/06/2026

【Curremt News】 Carriers Are Asking $6,000 to Europe. The Space Shortage Means They Might Just Get It.

Asia-Europe rates are moving fast in June, and the distance between what carriers are publishing and what the spot market currently shows is the defining tension on this corridor right now.

MSC has set Far East-North Europe FAK rates at $6,000 per 40ft for the second half of June, up $1,300 from its own first-half level of $4,700, a 28% jump within a single month. The rate applies from all Far East ports to Northern Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Black Sea from June 15 to June 30.

The other major carriers are moving in the same direction. CMA CGM set North Europe FAK rates at $4,700 per 40ft for June 1-14. Its West Mediterranean rates rise to $6,500 per 40ft from June 15. Hapag-Lloyd published North Europe rates at $4,300 per 40ft and West Mediterranean rates at $5,500 per 40ft from June 1. Maersk announced a Peak Season Surcharge of $600 per 40ft from Far East Asia to North Europe and Mediterranean, effective June 10.

Against these carrier announcements, Drewry's World Container Index stood at $2,800 per 40ft as of May 28, up 3% for the fourth consecutive weekly increase. Shanghai-Rotterdam was at $2,861 and Shanghai-Genoa at $4,253. The gap between published FAK levels and current spot rates is substantial. Whether it closes is the question that matters most for anyone booking cargo this month.

Industry sources suggest it likely will. One forwarder told The Loadstar: "The signs are that the 15 June FAK will stick, because you cannot get space in the second half of June in the market." The same source estimated spot rates could reach $6,000 to $7,000 per 40ft in the second half of June and into July. CMA CGM has also said it will not cap its June 1 peak season surcharge and will review it every two weeks.

The drivers behind the increase are all running in the same direction simultaneously. The US tariff deadline of July 24 has generated a front-loading rush from Asian exporters. Red Sea and Hormuz disruptions continue to constrain effective capacity. Peak season demand has arrived. Blank sailings on Asia-Europe have been relatively limited, meaning supply is not being artificially tightened to manufacture the increase.

For cargo moving from Asia to Europe, the second half of June is shaping up to be a pay-to-play environment. The window to book at first-half June rates is closing this week.

https://s.tgl-group.net/967k33

Container lines raise June rates; MSC leads with 28% hike

【時事分享】 搶在7月24日前出貨,貨主寧可多付運費也不等這場搶艙潮的邏輯,只需要一個簡單的算術。美國對進口商品加徵的10%臨時關稅將於7月24日到期,一旦到期後稅率結構改變,成本就難以掌控。台灣、中國大陸與東南亞的出口商因此搶在截止日前完...
08/06/2026

【時事分享】 搶在7月24日前出貨,貨主寧可多付運費也不等

這場搶艙潮的邏輯,只需要一個簡單的算術。

美國對進口商品加徵的10%臨時關稅將於7月24日到期,一旦到期後稅率結構改變,成本就難以掌控。台灣、中國大陸與東南亞的出口商因此搶在截止日前完成出貨,理由很直接:就算每個貨櫃的運費多出1,000至2,000美元,相較於一只貨櫃動輒數萬美元的商品總值若面臨額外關稅,運費的漲幅根本不算什麼。

這個算術正在直接反映在運價數字上。根據最新上海出口集裝箱運價指數(SCFI):

• 遠東至美西:每FEU達4,149美元,月漲52%
• 遠東至美東:每FEU達5,333美元,月漲44%
• 遠東至歐洲:每TEU達2,475美元,月漲62%
• 遠東至地中海:每TEU達3,750美元,月漲54%

原本相對平靜的歐洲航線跟著大漲,背後不只是需求拉升,紅海危機與荷姆茲封鎖帶來的雙重繞道壓力也是推手之一。船公司已陸續在6月初及中旬發出GRI(綜合費率附加費),每櫃加徵1,000至2,000美元,7月1日還有新一波GRI在排隊。市場熱度強到讓業者直言艙位極度稀缺,現在訂艙的難度遠高於往常。

長榮、陽明、萬海對後市看法一致:荷姆茲封鎖風險仍高,紅海短期恢復正常的機率不大,塞港、缺櫃、缺船的問題持續,第二、三季運價全面走升的趨勢難以逆轉。

7月24日是這波搶艙潮的核心時間點。截止日過後需求是否會快速降溫,目前仍有不確定性,但至少在這個日期之前,訂艙難、運費高,是確定的現實。

https://s.tgl-group.net/967h4t

#貨櫃運費 #海運出口 #搶艙潮 #國際海運 #供應鏈風險

全球海運搶艙潮一波波!美國政府對進口商品課徵10%臨時關稅將於7月24日落日,亞洲出口商搶出貨、運抵美國,6月初及中旬,海運業者陸續發出GRI(綜合費率附加費),每櫃將加徵1,000-2,000美元區間,推估6月運價漲勢將擴大。

【Current News】 Trump Threatened to Bomb a US Ally. That Ally Has Been Helping Him Negotiate.Iran's approach to the Strai...
04/06/2026

【Current News】 Trump Threatened to Bomb a US Ally. That Ally Has Been Helping Him Negotiate.

Iran's approach to the Strait of Hormuz is shifting in a direction that has no precedent in international maritime law. Since establishing the Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) on May 5, Tehran has been pressing ahead with plans to formalize control over transit through the strait, including reportedly negotiating with Oman to jointly charge a toll on all passing vessels. The UN's International Maritime Organization was explicit in its response: no international agreement permits tolls to be levied on transit through an international strait, and any such precedent would be considered dangerous.

Washington's reaction landed in an unusual place.

On May 27, speaking during a White House cabinet meeting, Trump issued a direct threat against Oman, saying "Oman will behave just like everybody else. Or else we'll have to blow them up. They understand that. They'll be fine." The statement was notable for its target. Oman is a decades-long US military and economic partner with a population of 5.3 million, has served as one of the key neutral mediators throughout the US-Iran conflict, and has itself been attacked by Iran during the war. Threatening military action against a mediating ally in the same conflict you are trying to end is not a conventional diplomatic position.

The broader negotiating picture has been complicated. During the same cabinet meeting, Trump accused Tehran of trying to "outwait" him until November's midterm elections. Republican hawks pushed back separately on a rumored 60-day ceasefire, with Senator Roger Wicker, chair of the Senate armed services committee, calling it a "disaster" and warning that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught."

Treasury Secretary Bessent separately warned that the US would "aggressively target" any individuals or entities facilitating Hormuz tolls, specifically naming Oman as a country that should understand the consequences of cooperation with Iran on this matter.

Since May 29, an MOU framework has taken shape: a 60-day ceasefire extension, unrestricted shipping with no tolls, and a 30-day window for Iran to clear sea mines. But Trump has since requested amendments, Iran disputed the "unrestricted" framing, and both sides kept exchanging strikes. The US hit targets near Bandar Abbas; Iran fired ballistic missiles toward Kuwait in response.

As of early June the deal remains unsigned. One former senior US energy official put it plainly: regardless of what any agreement says, most actors in the region already believe Iran holds effective control of the strait. That gap between what a deal might state and what it can actually enforce is the open question no MOU has answered yet.

https://s.tgl-group.net/95u3lq

US president calls on US ally to ‘behave … or else we’ll have to blow them up’ in casual aside during cabinet meeting

Address

3 F. , No. 512-1, Sec. 4, Bade Road , Songshan Dist. , Taipei City7
Taipei
10505

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 18:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 18:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 18:00
Thursday 09:00 - 18:00
Friday 09:00 - 18:00

Telephone

+886227698656

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Team Global Logistics Company Limited posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share