05/01/2015
Cargo hand in hold could have kept job, averted probe had if he not panicked
HAD sleeping cargo worker Willa Junior had not panicked when he woke in pitch darkness with engines roaring inflight in the cargo hold of a Boeing 737-900 operated by Alaska Airlines and completed the journey to Los Angeles (LAX) one could argue that the carrier could have mitigated intense government and media scrutiny.
Continuing to LAX, the cargo worker could have continued use of his lie flat "bed," relaxed and used his phone for light or even to tap into flight 448's Wi-Fi program, reported Minnesota Connected. Instead, his frantic pounding on the ceiling caught the attention of first class passengers as well as two air marshals, and forced the aircraft to turn around and make an emergency landing at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, just 14 minutes into its journey.
The flight was met by scores of Seattle Transport Security Administration (TSA) and local law enforcement personnel and cost the airline thousands of dollars in wasted fuel. Alaska Airlines responded by banning the employee Willa for life from working on any of its cargo operations. According to airline cargo experts travelling in the cargo bin of a passenger aircraft is not nearly as daunting as one might think. Consider that a major airline such as United ships 130,000 pets a year using that same cargo bin, with a failure rate that is infinitesimal. Moreover, Boeing aircraft are designed to provide a steady, heated air flow to the front cargo bin, generated from the same system serving the passenger cabin. It will be a bit colder, with factory specification calling for a temperature range of 45-65 degrees Fahrenheit.
The bin is also pressurized to an 8,000 foot altitude which would be dry, and safe. The cargo bin entrance is only 35 inches high by 48 inches wide, but more than 20 feet in length. Pets in crates and cargo packages would likely be scattered about. Had the employee kept his wits about him and completed the flight when the door opened at LAX, the employee would have startled baggage handlers but they would have quickly noticed his uniform and visible airline identification. It's likely the incident would have missed the national spotlight and begun as an internal company investigation. Instead, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), TSA and airport officials have begun a full-scale investigation.